shellybeachblog

The Shelly Beach blogsite. Philosophy. Apologetics. Theology. Humour. Worship. Prayer requests. Comments.

Friday, February 03, 2006

How to end a conversation

There are several words and phrases that I think we should voluntarily ban from discussion and dialog. I hear them often, and they seem to me to be ways of feigning an argument when there is no substance, devices to avoid facing the consequences of a good argument. Rather than furthering a dialog, they shut it down and actually mischaracterise the other's statements very uncharitably. Here they are:

labeling a criticism as an "attack"
dismissing disapproval as "bashing"
mistaking a moral argument for a legal one and insisting that "people have a right to do what they want"
avoiding making a substantive response by stating, "Well, that's your opinion."
mistaking a moral claim for a preference claim: Well, I wouldn't want to have an abortion.
That works with vegetables, not morals: Well, I wouldn't eat beetroot.

These are phrases unworthy of a good dialog where both people should make a good case and acknowledge when one is made. Be on the lookout for them, and examine your own rhetoric for these tricks of the tongue.

2 Comments:

At Saturday, 01 April, 2006, Blogger john jensen said...

there is a time when it is an attack and not a criticism don't you think? When people make personal insults? Is that not verbal attack? I think occasionally these word are truths and not mere rhetorical devices.

Ofcourse you will say that its just my opinion.

:)

the rev

 
At Monday, 03 April, 2006, Blogger Ab Truth said...

of course.. some people actually are stupid.. :-)

 

Post a Comment

<< Home